In the past I’ve not given too much thought to the global warming debate and when the thought occurred to me I mainly was in favor of a warmer climate since I spend most my time in a ripped pair of jeans and no shirt. Recently however, citizens across the country have had their natural skepticism confirmed by an entire series of academic and scientific tomfoolery on the part of scientists now seemingly intent on cashing in on the multitude of grants and celebrity adoration available to global warming enthusiasts.

A close friend of mine, Dr. Bruce Banner tells me that  much of the work done on a man caused global warming event been seriously compromised by perhaps accidental but in many cases seemingly purposeful manipulation of data to achieve the desired outcome. In some instances apparently to keep the money flowing by fanning public hysteria.

The fact that something is being studied scientifically does not mean that its purpose is without blemish and can run the range from the silly to the extreme of what Churchill referred to as the lights of perverted science.

While we still are struggling to place our understanding of climate in the proper context it seems that the use of Occam’s razor of the simplest explanation being the most likely correct one has been lost; the simplest explanation for climate cycles seems to be related to the activity of the sun.  This is wildly frustrating to secular humanists who wish to think that everything that happens is within the reach of man.

So my thoughts are that angry retorts from the “warmers” crowd and their cultlike devotion to man’s supremacy over nature is just that — another example of man wishing to see himself as all powerful and refusing to accept the power of the cosmic order.

No one wishes to seem puny and sometimes that fear leads to bullying… Hulk hate puny bullies… Hulk protect from bully… HULK SMASH!